Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42142113›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Quality over quantity: biopsy-anchored CT radiogenomics models outperform all-lesion training in a multi-tumour cohort despite a smaller sample size.

Diana Ivonne Rodríguez Sánchez, Julian Middelkoop, Thera Vanneste, Olga Maxouri, Stephan Ursprung, Sajjad Rostami, Nino Bogveradze, Kalina Chupetlovska, Francesca Castagnoli, Federica Landolfi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Diana Ivonne Rodríguez SánchezDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julian MiddelkoopDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thera VannesteDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olga MaxouriDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephan UrsprungDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sajjad RostamiDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nino BogveradzeDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kalina ChupetlovskaDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francesca CastagnoliDepartment of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Federica LandolfiRadiology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eun Kyoung HongDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Andrea Delli PizziDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Nicolo GennaroFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, NMH/Arkes Family Pavilion Suite 800, 676 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Warissara JutidamrongphanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Liliana PetrychenkoDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petur SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zuhir BodalalDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Regina Beets-TanGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. r.beetstan@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-5090

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 101034290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadiogenomics aims to non-invasively predict tumour genotypes from imaging, but most studies assume molecular homogeneity by assigning a single biopsy-derived label to all lesions within a patient. This approach risks substantial label noise given well-documented interlesional heterogeneity. We investigated whether anchoring training to biopsy-confirmed lesions improves radiogenomic model performance and generalisability. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 1646 patients (11473 segmented lesions) with contrast-enhanced CT and EGFR mutation status from next-generation sequencing at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, alongside an external NSCLC radiogenomics cohort (n = 158). All visible lesions were segmented, and the exact biopsy site was matched to its segmentation. Radiomic features were extracted, and machine learning models were trained with three lesion selection strategies: all lesions, non-biopsied lesions only, and biopsy-confirmed lesions only. To disentangle label quality from sample size, we created size-matched variants (one lesion per patient) for all-lesion and non-biopsied strategies.

resultsAll models achieved significant discrimination of EGFR status on internal validation (AUC = 0.62-0.68). However, performance of the all-lesion and non-biopsied models declined on external validation (AUC = 0.55-0.63), while the biopsy-anchored model maintained stable performance (AUC = 0.62), despite having only 1/10th of the training sample size. When training sets were size-matched, the biopsy-anchored approach significantly outperformed a model trained on all available lesions on external validation (p = 0.037).

conclusionsRadiogenomic models trained on biopsy-confirmed lesions outperform conventional all-lesion strategies in external validation, despite using an order of magnitude fewer samples. Prioritising lesion-level label fidelity can mitigate heterogeneity-driven noise, enhancing robustness and clinical translation of imaging-based genomic prediction. KEY POINTS: Question Does assigning biopsy-derived molecular labels to all lesions introduce heterogeneity-driven label noise that reduces the generalisability of radiogenomic models? Findings Models trained exclusively on biopsy-confirmed lesions demonstrated superior external generalisability compared with all-lesion approaches, despite being trained on substantially fewer samples. Clinical relevance Biopsy-anchored radiogenomics improves the reliability of non-invasive mutation prediction by accounting for tumour heterogeneity, potentially supporting clinical decision-making when tissue sampling is limited or molecular results are discordant across lesions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImaging GenomicsLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedBiopsyContrast MediaErbB ReceptorsFemaleGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMutationNetherlandsContrast MediaErbB ReceptorsBiopsyEpidermal Growth Factor ReceptorMachine LearningRadiogenomicsTumour heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42142113
PMCPMC13574897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.