ArticleJACC. Asia2026
Ambulatory Versus Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Chinese Outpatients.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent hypertension guidelines recommend either ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) monitoring for the management of hypertension. How we should properly utilize these 2 out-of-office BP measurement techniques remains under investigation.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate ambulatory and home BP monitoring in the definition of BP phenotypes with regard to cardiovascular outcomes.
methodsIn a nationwide prospective cohort, baseline observations were collected from August 2009 to October 2017, with last follow-ups in July 2024.
resultsAmong 4,935 participants (mean age 54.3 years), median follow-up time was 4.9 years. The incidence rate of all cardiovascular events (n = 256), stroke (n = 100), and cardiac events (n = 171) was significantly (P ≤ 0.001) higher in 2,894 treated (14.9, 5.9, and 9.7 per 1,000 person-years, respectively) than 2,041 untreated outpatients (4.5, 1.4, and 3.2 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). In untreated patients, the analyses adjusted for confounders and mutually one for another out-of-office BP measurement technique showed that ambulatory but not home (masked and sustained) hypertension was associated with a higher risk of cardiac events relative to normotension (HR: 9.01; 95% CI: 1.10-73.91; and HR: 9.74; 95% CI: 1.01-94.25, respectively). In treated patients, the similarly adjusted analyses showed that home but not ambulatory sustained uncontrolled hypertension was associated with a higher risk of all cardiovascular events (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.12-2.92; P = 0.02) and stroke (HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.00-5.42; P = 0.05) relative to controlled hypertension.
conclusionsOur study in young and middle-aged outpatients indicates a preferable role of ambulatory and home BP monitoring, respectively, in untreated and treated patients in cardiovascular prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.