ArticleHematological oncology2026
Extended Versus Standard Hypomethylating Agent Dosing in Combination With Venetoclax in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Hematological oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Host Fitness: A Missing Dimension of Precision Medicine in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Hematological oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal duration of hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy combined with venetoclax (Ven) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) remains uncertain. Standard of care (SOC) uses 5-day decitabine (Dec-5) or 7-day azacitidine (Aza-7), while extended HMA regimens (e.g., 10-day decitabine [Dec-10] during cycle 1) have also been explored, although direct comparative data between these approaches are limited. We conducted a large retrospective analysis of 335 patients with ND-AML treated at five US centers with Dec-10/Ven (n = 102) or SOC HMA/Ven (n = 233). Baseline characteristics were largely balanced, though the Dec-10 group had more treated secondary AML, and the SOC group had more intermediate risk by ELN-2024. Dec-10/Ven exhibited significantly higher composite complete remission rates (CRc) (82% vs. 70%, p = 0.029), but similar measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rates (27% vs. 25%, p = 0.6) at best response. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer for Dec-10/Ven, 22.2 versus 9.1 months for SOC (p < 0.001). Transplantation was more frequent following Dec-10/Ven (25% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were similar (7% vs. 11%, p = 0.4; 13% vs. 23%, p = 0.1). On multivariable analysis, the Dec-10 regimen, de novo AML, non-complex karyotype, and IDH2 mutation were associated with a significantly lower risk of death. Our findings suggest that Dec-10/Ven may lead to improved transplant rates and survival, providing valuable real-world support for this intensified approach in appropriate patients. Prospective randomized evaluation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.