Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141960›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2026

Diagnostic value of stand-alone videos after inconclusive inpatient EEG-video monitoring.

Marina O Azevedo, Ushtar Amin, Angelica Rivera-Cruz, Kristen Zemina, Mark Armanious, Ana Omura, Nicholas Tenney, Yangxin Huang, Selim R Benbadis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Is a Video Worth a Thousand EEGs?Epilepsy currents · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marina O AzevedoNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9266-7282
Ushtar AminNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-3752
Angelica Rivera-CruzNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4688-0364
Kristen ZeminaNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6513-4896
Mark ArmaniousNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2327-6960
Ana OmuraNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6679-0323
Nicholas TenneyNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4357-0154
Yangxin HuangBiostatistics & Data Science Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-8061
Selim R BenbadisNeurology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-5492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inpatient electroencephalographic (EEG)-video monitoring occasionally fails to capture the events in question, leaving patients without a definitive diagnosis. Management after an inconclusive admission is generally limited to repeating monitoring or empirical adjustment of antiseizure medications. Although stand-alone videos are increasingly used in clinical practice, their diagnostic value in this setting has not been well established. We aimed to assess the diagnostic contribution, submission rate, and interrater reliability of stand-alone videos obtained after inconclusive inpatient EEG-video monitoring. Over a 26-month period, we prospectively identified patients with inconclusive epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admissions who were instructed to submit videos of typical events not captured during their stay. Submitted videos were independently reviewed by two epileptologists, with adjudication by a third reviewer when consensus was not achieved. Among 619 EMU admissions, 165 (27%) were inconclusive. Twenty-seven (16%) patients submitted a stand-alone video. A definitive conclusion was reached in 23 (85%) patients, and in 20 (74%) patients, videos either established, confirmed, or revealed an additional diagnosis. Substantial interrater reliability was observed (κ = .690, 95% confidence interval = .456-.893), with perfect agreement for nonepileptic and physiologic events. This study provides preliminary evidence that stand-alone videos have the potential to be a valuable adjunct in the evaluation of seizures and seizurelike events after inconclusive EMU admissions. Early and systematic reinforcement of video collection may improve diagnostic yield and reduce health care utilization when inpatient studies are unrevealing.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEpilepsyVideo RecordingAdultFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeizuresYoung AdultEEGEEG‐videosemiologyvideo

Identifiers

PMID42141960
PMCPMC13360987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.