Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141914›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026

Evaluation of a novel lateral flow immunochromatographic assay, Certest ResisCheck® Carbapenemases, for the rapid detection and differentiation of carbapenemase in Gram-negative bacteria from bacterial culture.

Laura Monge-Olivares, Inmaculada López-Hernández, Felipe Fernández-Cuenca, Álvaro Pascual Hernández, Lorena López-Cerero

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura Monge-OlivaresInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, SE 41009, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3476-9737
Inmaculada López-HernándezInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, SE 41009, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-1303
Felipe Fernández-CuencaInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, SE 41009, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-6130
Álvaro Pascual HernándezInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, SE 41009, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-5891
Lorena López-CereroInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, SE 41009, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8950-4384

Funding

European Regional Development Fund PLEC2024-011123European Union PLEC2021-007972Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCarbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria represent a major clinical challenge. Rapid detection and characterization of carbapenemase group is essential for guiding therapy and for infection control. We evaluated the performance of Certest ResisCheck® Carbapenemases, a novel lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), for detecting the main carbapenemase groups from bacterial culture. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multicentre collection of 351 well-characterized clinical Gram-negative isolates, studied by whole-genome sequencing, was tested using this assay. 57 KPC, 53 NDM, 63 VIM, 68 OXA-48-like, 64 IMP and 100 carbapenem resistant non-carbapenemase producers were included.

resultsThe LFIA showed an overall sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 100%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 100%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 91.7%. No false-positives or cross-reactions with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) or cephalosporinases were observed either with isolates harbouring multiple carbapenemases. Detection rates for IMP and NDM variants reached 100%. Sensitivity for KPC, OXA-like and VIM was slightly lower (93.0%, 95.6% and 96.8%, respectively). Nine false-negative results were observed: KPC-31 (n = 4), VIM-63 (n = 2) and OXA-1054-producing (n = 3) isolates. Increasing the bacterial inoculum managed to obtain a positive result for KPC-31 and VIM-63, but OXA-1054 remained undetected.

conclusionsCertest ResisCheck® Carbapenemases is a rapid, accurate, and reliable tool for detecting carbapenemases in clinical settings. While some rare variants may escape detection, its strong performance across diverse bacterial species supports its use as part of routine diagnostics to guide timely antimicrobial therapy and control the spread of resistance.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesChromatography, AffinityGram-Negative BacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansImmunoassayPredictive Value of TestsRapid Diagnostic TestsSensitivity and SpecificityWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasescarbapenemase

Identifiers

PMID42141914
PMCPMC13179495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.