ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Using ΦPSII and leaf temperature as indicators of non-steady-state photosynthesis and stomatal conductance during stepwise changes in light intensity.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying the kinetics of net CO2 assimilation (A) and stomatal conductance (gs) under fluctuating light typically relies on gas exchange measurements, which are slow and thus unsuited for high-throughput phenotyping. As a result, faster, non-invasive phenotyping methods are needed to further evaluate these traits at a larger scale. However, first the relationship between non-steady-state parameters must be examined in greater detail. In this study, we aimed to determine whether variations in non-steady-state values of chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf temperature reflect differences in key gas exchange traits under fluctuating light conditions. Here, the correlations between the times required for a change in non-steady-state A, gs, operating efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), and leaf temperature (Tleaf) during stepwise changes in light intensity were evaluated across nine plant species. Both steady-state and non-steady-state photosynthetic traits varied significantly among species. Overall, we found significant positive correlations between non-steady-state A and ΦPSII for time to 50% and 90% of final steady-state values (t50; r2 = 0.70) and (t90; r2 = 0.33). The t90 of gs and that of Tleaf were also significantly correlated after both increases (r2 = 0.45) and decreases (r2 = 0.61) in light intensity. Our findings suggest that the times required for a change in ΦPSII (particularly t50) and Tleaf (particularly t90) can be used as indicators of dynamic A and gs, respectively, facilitating faster phenotyping of the complex processes of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance kinetics in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.