Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141816›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Influence of vapour pressure deficit and CO

Alexander W Cheesman, Peter Cox, Simon Jones, Kali B Middleby, Lucas A Cernusak, Peter J Franks

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander W CheesmanCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld, 4878, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-5766
Peter CoxDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Laver Building, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-2219
Simon JonesDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Laver Building, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-2318
Kali B MiddlebyAMAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, 34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-0870
Lucas A CernusakCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld, 4878, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7575-5526
Peter J FranksSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-658X

Funding

Australian Research Council DP240101938Human Frontier Science Program RGP0016/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal conductance to water vapour (g

Indexed as

Carbon DioxidePlant StomataTreesVapor PressureAcclimatizationClimate ChangeModels, BiologicalPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationTemperatureTropical ClimateWaterCarbon DioxideWaterclimate changegas exchangeleaf temperaturestomatal conductancewater use

Identifiers

PMID42141816
PMCPMC13326507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.