ReviewInternal medicine journal2026
Evolving practice of general internal medicine in the current medical landscape.
Review in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
General internal medicine is a specialty that is heterogeneously implemented across the world. In some places, it includes physicians who have undergone basic internal medicine training with no subspecialisation, whereas in other places, these physicians undergo further training to become 'advanced internists' (with the corollary name of advanced internal medicine). General internists run inpatient medical wards and ambulatory care services, provide consultation to general practitioners and/or have their own primary care practice. Within the hospital, the role of the general internist had traditionally been ambiguous - often serving as a 'catch-all' medical service for patients deemed unsuitable to be managed under subspecialty teams. Over the years, different models of care within general medicine have been trialled to varying effects, ranging from the 'generalist-specialist' model (also known as the hospitalist model, where the general internist coordinates care for multimorbid patients with liaison with relevant subspecialties) and 'acute medicine' model (general medicine care only for the first 72 h of admission in an acute medical unit, after which patients who require continued admission go to a subspecialty) to the 'specialist-generalist' model (where all specialists are to care holistically for general medical issues beyond the specific condition that warrants subspecialty review). In this article, we advocate for a renewed framework of general internal medicine that focusses on managing undifferentiated, complex and multimorbid patients, providing clinical care that addresses prevailing gaps in hospital-based practice, developing robust hospital-at-home services and championing quality improvement, education and administrative excellence within the medical ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.