Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141528›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026

Protected Engagement Time and Related Interventions: A Scoping Review of Experience and Outcomes, and Relevance to the Australian Context.

Donna Hristodoulidis, Brent Hayward, Adam Searby

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donna HristodoulidisMonash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-9460
Brent HaywardMonash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-2756
Adam SearbyMonash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engagement between mental health nurses (MHNs) and older adults on acute mental health units is often hindered by age-related factors such as cognitive decline, frailty and sensory impairment, as well as psychosocial challenges including bereavement, social isolation and loss of identity. This makes therapeutic engagement essential on older adult mental health units. However, high workloads, administrative demands and the dominance of risk management often limit meaningful interactions. Protected engagement time (PET), originally introduced in the United Kingdom, was designed to preserve dedicated, interruption-free time for MHNs to engage therapeutically with consumers. This scoping review aimed to map existing literature on PET and to examine its relevance to the Australian older adult acute mental health context. The review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. After screening, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, with none conducted in Australia, and only two focused specifically on older adult units. Data analysis revealed four overarching categories: relational engagement and therapeutic presence, individualised and meaningful engagement, staffing and organisational structure, and outcomes and broader impacts. This scoping review suggests that PET can positively influence engagement between mental health consumers and MHNs, with benefits extending beyond the sessions themselves. However, the review highlights the need to evaluate how this approach may be integrated in older adult mental health units to enhance the therapeutic relationships, promote recovery and uphold dignity to some of the most vulnerable consumers in mental health care.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNurse-Patient RelationsPsychiatric NursingAgedAustraliaHumansagedmental healthmental health nursingolder adultpsychiatric nursing

Identifiers

PMID42141528
PMCPMC13179429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.