ArticleBMC nursing2026
Clarifying social undermining in nursing: a concept analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial undermining is a subtle and covert form of negative interpersonal behavior that can disrupt professional relationships, undermine self-confidence, and negatively influence nursing practice. Despite its relevance, this concept has not been systematically clarified within the nursing literature.
methodsThis study employed Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis method to clarify the meaning and dimensions of social undermining in nursing. A comprehensive review of English and Persian literature published between 2000 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Scientific Information Database.
resultsThe analysis identified social undermining as an intentional, covert, and repetitive process characterized by subtle behaviors that progressively erode professional trust and collaboration. Key antecedents included individual factors such as perceived competition and interpersonal insecurity, as well as organizational conditions such as workload pressure, perceived injustice, and inadequate managerial support. The consequences extended from emotional exhaustion and reduced job satisfaction at the individual level to disrupted teamwork, increased turnover intention, and potential risks to care processes at the organizational level. Social undermining was conceptually distinguished from incivility and bullying by its indirect nature, cumulative impact, and reliance on concealed behaviors rather than overt aggression. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Social undermining represents a distinct and significant challenge in nursing work environments. Clarifying this concept provides a foundation for developing nursing-specific assessment tools and targeted organizational strategies aimed at fostering psychologically safe and supportive workplace cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.