ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Transcriptomic profiling across stages of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer identifies fibroblast activation protein-alpha as a stromal biomarker associated with progression.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents a biologically aggressive subgroup with substantial heterogeneity in recurrence and progression risk. Current clinicopathological risk stratification tools lack sufficient precision to identify patients at the highest risk of progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
objectiveTo characterize transcriptomic differences between T1 and < T1 (Ta/Tis) NMIBC and to explore the association of fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) gene expression with disease progression.
methodsTranscriptomic profiling was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue from 66 patients with primary, treatment-naïve NMIBC and 5 patients with T2 disease (included for exploratory comparisons). Analyses included differential gene expression, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), molecular subtyping, immune cell deconvolution, and evaluation of FAP expression in relation to recurrence and progression. External validation of FAP was conducted in three independent NMIBC cohorts.
resultsT1 tumors demonstrated a distinct transcriptomic profile compared with < T1 tumors, characterized by enrichment of cell cycle-related and metabolic pathways and a higher prevalence of aggressive molecular subtypes. Despite these molecular differences, no statistically significant differences in recurrence-free, progression-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were observed, likely reflecting limited event numbers. Among recurrent tumors, early recurrences (≤ 24 months) were associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition signatures. FAP expression increased with tumor stage (p = 0.0005) and was associated with progression (p = 0.002) and mortality (p = 0.01). Patients with tumors in the highest quartile of FAP expression had worse progression-free survival. This association was consistently observed in three external NMIBC cohorts.
conclusionsT1 NMIBC exhibits distinct transcriptomic features suggestive of increased biological aggressiveness. Elevated FAP expression is reproducibly associated with progression risk across multiple cohorts, supporting its potential role as a biomarker of aggressive disease. Given the limited number of progression events, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.