Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141405›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Reclaiming Indigenous birth: research framework to assess the economic costs and outcomes of obstetric evacuation and experiences of Indigenous midwifery in Canada.

Jennifer Leason, Claire Dion, Jennifer Murray, Carol Couchie, Elizabeth Darling, Ava John-Baptiste, Karen Lawford, Evelyn Good Striker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer LeasonDepartment of Political Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. jennifer.leason@ucalgary.ca.
Claire DionMidwifery Education Program, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer MurraySchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Carol CouchieNational Council of Indigenous Midwives, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Elizabeth DarlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ava John-BaptisteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Karen LawfordMidwifery Education Program, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Evelyn Good StrikerDepartment of Political Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Canada 439167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous communities in Canada (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples) have distinct traditional knowledge and practices for pregnancy and birth, and these have sustained healthy and thriving Indigenous communities for millennia. Indigenous midwives historically held a leading role as primary providers of sexual and reproductive healthcare. However, colonial practices severely disrupted the role of Indigenous midwives and the transfer of their knowledge from generation to generation. The obstetric evacuation policy in Canada requires people who live in rural and remote locations to leave their community to have a hospital delivery. Evidence suggests this policy negatively impacts Indigenous people who desire to give birth in their communities. To implement optimal perinatal care for Indigenous people, Indigenous midwives in Canada seek evidence to answer the following questions: (1) What is the cost of obstetric evacuation, compared to Indigenous midwifery? And (2) What are the health outcomes for obstetric evacuation versus Indigenous midwifery?

methodsWe present our framework for Reclaiming Indigenous Birth, a study using multiple methods. Our framework brought together researchers, midwives (National Council of Indigenous Midwives, Association of Ontario Midwives, and Juniper Midwives), community organizations (Native Women's Association of Canada and Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada) and knowledge users (Indigenous Services Canada). We used Gwayakgooshgawin (balance) to bring four disciplines together in a theoretical framework: Indigenous methodologies, gender-based analysis, critical medical anthropology, and population and public health. We then created a relational framework with guidance of the Seven Grandparent Teachings, which taught us to nurture relations with research team members, partner organizations, and individuals whose data was included in this study. We upheld standards for Indigenous research ethics. The specific objectives of this study were to: (1) examine economic costs and outcomes of obstetric evacuation and Indigenous midwifery; (2) understand experiences of Indigenous midwifery; and (3) conduct knowledge translation activities to inform policy and programming for perinatal health in Indigenous communities. DISCUSSION: This research framework will contribute evidence to support calls to action to reclaim Indigenous ways of birth and address disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in birth outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHealth Services, IndigenousIndigenous CanadiansMidwiferyCanadaFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyFirst NationsIndigenous midwiferyIndigenous PeoplesInuitMétisObstetric evacuationPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42141405
PMCPMC13352813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.