ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Regression-based model for predicting preterm birth using vaginal lactobacilli and routine clinical data.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although increasing evidence links vaginal microbiota to preterm birth, clinically practical models integrating microbial and clinical indicators are lacking. We aimed to develop a model that combines vaginal microbiota with routine clinical data for prenatal PTB risk assessment.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study including 4,558 pregnant women who delivered between 2019 and 2023 at the Women's and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Clinical variables included blood counts, biochemical tests, and vaginal microbiota. After excluding incomplete and non-hospital cases, we excluded clinical variables with missing rates greater than 50% to improve data quality and the accuracy of model predictions. For variables with less than 50% missingness, we applied the MissForest algorithm for non-parametric imputation, 1,228 participants were included in the final analysis for model development. Logistic, LASSO, and Poisson regression models were internally validated, with no external validation performed.
resultsReduced vaginal Lactobacillus, vaginal fluid leakage, abnormal blood glucose, and elevated Cystatin C were significantly associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (Lactobacillus reduction OR = 1.723; PROM OR = 3.297; abnormal glucose OR = 1.401; Cystatin C OR = 4.298; all P < 0.05). When the logistic prediction model combining indicators reflecting vaginal microecological imbalance (such as reduced Lactobacillus, vaginal cleanliness, microbial density, fungi, hydrogen peroxide, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) with clinical variables including cervical cerclage (performed for CL ≤ 25 mm), vaginal fluid leakage, blood glucose, uric acid, and Cystatin C, the model demonstrated moderate predictive performance for preterm birth (AUC = 0.753), suggesting that integrating vaginal microbiota with routine clinical parameters may improve the accuracy of prenatal risk assessment for preterm birth.
conclusionsThis study constructed a prediction model for preterm birth integrating routine prenatal examination indicators and vaginal microbiota information. The model provides a preliminary, feasible, and low-cost framework approach for prenatal risk stratification in pregnancy. However, at this stage, it should be regarded as an exploratory research prototype that requires further multicenter validation across diverse clinical settings and populations before potential clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.