ArticleBMC public health2026
Retail food environment assessments: a case study of consumer and community nutrition environment perspectives of Logan, Utah.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetail food environments are unevenly distributed in communities, often leading to structural inequities. Understanding these inequities is critical for designing effective, equity-focused interventions, especially in understudied smaller metropolitan areas. The consumer nutrition environment, which include in-store factors and community nutrition environments, covering neighborhood-level access both influence food purchasing behaviors. Measuring these environments provides a comprehensive view of factors shaping food choices, essential for targeted improvements in healthy food access and equity. This study examined the healthiness of food available in Logan, a growing small metropolitan area with a distinctive "main street food corridor".
methodsA comprehensive food store audit was conducted using existing validated food audit tool across various store types and categories. Kernel density analysis in ArcGIS Pro was used to assess the location, type, and healthfulness of different food retail outlets throughout Logan based on Consumer Nutrition Environment Scores (CNES).
resultsKey findings show that Logan's foodscape is dominated by fast-food and full-service restaurants, making up over half of all stores. Our study revealed significant variability in CNES across different store types and categories with supermarkets and healthy specialty stores scoring highest, an indication of a better consumer nutrition environment, while convenience stores with gas stations scoring lowest, reflecting poorer support for healthy choices. Healthy specialty stores had superior CNES at the store-category level.
conclusionWhile disparities exist in the availability of healthy food options across store types in Logan, the dominance of fast-food and full-service restaurants presents both challenges and opportunities to promote healthier options through partnerships and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.