Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141357›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026

Uncovering the Roots of Inequity: Social Determinants and Racial Disparities Among Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients.

Manar Z Al Rubaye, Kaleem S Ahmed, Sheriff M Issaka, Muhammad Maisam, L N Stalter, Anas H Awan, Sharon M Weber, Syed Nabeel Zafar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manar Z Al RubayeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. malrubaye@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7536-6350
Kaleem S AhmedDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sheriff M IssakaUCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Muhammad MaisamDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
L N StalterDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Anas H AwanUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Sharon M WeberDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Syed Nabeel ZafarDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520-48S4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial Determinants of Health (SDoH) profoundly influence cancer outcomes, yet their distribution among racially diverse gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients remains understudied. This study examines racial differences in SDoH between non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Non-White (including Asian, African American, and Hispanic) patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers using data from the All of Us Research Program.

methodsA total of 6,620 participants with GI cancer were identified using ICD-10 and SNOMED codes, of whom 1,831 completed the SDoH survey and were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized SDoH constructs such as social cohesion, support, and neighborhood disorder. Variables were categorized using validated scoring tools or grouped into tertiles. Group comparisons used chi-square, t-tests, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

resultsAmong the 1,831 participants included in the overall cohort, 80.7% (n = 1,478) identified as non-Hispanic White and 13.9% (n = 255) as Non-White, including Black or African American (6.2%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%), and Asian (1.4%). NHW participants were older (71.0 vs. 64.2 years) and reported greater social cohesion (3.9 vs. 3.6, p < 0.001) and support (3.9 vs. 3.7, p < 0.001). Non-White patients reported higher perceived discrimination (1.7 vs. 1.5, p = 0.016), daily spiritual experience (4.5 vs. 3.7, p < 0.001), neighborhood disorder (2.2 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), food insecurity (23.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), and housing issues (41.8% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001). Delayed care (47.1% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and unaffordability of care (9.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) were also more common.

conclusionSignificant racial disparities in SDoH were observed among GI cancer patients. Non-White individuals faced greater economic hardship, environmental disadvantage, and barriers to healthcare access. KEY MESSAGES: WHAT IS KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC: Racial disparities in gastrointestinal cancer outcomes persist, but the social and structural factors underlying these differences are not routinely captured in oncology research. Many cancer datasets emphasize clinical characteristics while underrepresenting patient-reported social, economic, and neighborhood conditions. Addressing social determinants of health is increasingly recognized as necessary to advance equity in cancer care delivery. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides a comprehensive, patient-reported assessment of social determinants of health among GI cancer patients in the All of Us Research Program. Non-White patients experience a higher burden of economic instability, neighborhood disadvantage, perceived stress,and barriers to accessing healthcare services. These findings identify concrete social risk domains that can inform equity-focused screening, care navigation, and policy interventions within oncology practice.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.