ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Baseline self-efficacy and engagement in a symptom management intervention after cancer treatment: an exploratory analysis of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to 1) test the relationship between self-efficacy to manage symptoms and engagement in a symptom self-management intervention and 2) examine the personal, behavioral, and environmental factors associated with engagement in symptom self-management after chemotherapy.
methodsThis exploratory analysis included data from 375 adult post-chemotherapy survivors of solid tumor cancers with comorbidities or elevated depressive symptoms enrolled in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Survivors were initially randomized to the Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook intervention (SMSH) or SMSH plus Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC); SMSH nonresponders (those with depression scores that remained at, or increased to, moderate or severe) at week four were rerandomized. Engagement was measured by 1) weekly session completion and 2) reported use of SMSH strategies. Baseline measures included demographics, symptom severity, comorbidities, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy. Associations were assessed using generalized linear mixed models.
resultsSMSH alone led to greater self-management strategy use than SMSH + TIPC. Baseline self-efficacy was associated with engagement in early weeks (1-4), whereas higher symptom severity reduced the likelihood of session completion. Age, female sex, and being married or living with a partner were associated with greater early strategy use. Among nonresponders, higher baseline depressive symptoms were associated with higher odds of strategy use during weeks 5-12.
conclusionSimpler formats like SMSH may better engage post-chemotherapy survivors with comorbidities or depressive symptoms. Factors associated with session completion and strategy use differed. Targeting self-efficacy and providing early support may help sustain engagement in symptom management and facilitate use of self-management strategies in later weeks among non-responders with higher depressive symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Reinforcing self-efficacy and providing focused support may help cancer survivors sustain symptom self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42141337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.