Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141315›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026

Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of pelvic floor muscle training combined with electromagnetic stimulation on pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women using three-dimensional ultrasound parameters.

Yanwen Que, Chengwen Xie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanwen QueDepartment of Ultrasound, Longyan First Hospital, 105 Jiuyi North Road, Longyan, 364000, Fujian Province, China.
Chengwen XieDepartment of Ultrasound, Longyan First Hospital, 105 Jiuyi North Road, Longyan, 364000, Fujian Province, China. chengwenxie@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting elderly women. This study aimed to evaluate whether combining pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromagnetic stimulation (EMS) provides better outcomes than PFMT alone, using objective three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound parameters.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 240 elderly women with POP treated between January 2023 and January 2025. Based on the received treatment, patients were grouped to a PFMT group (n = 114) or a PFMT-EMS group (n = 126). All patients underwent a standardized 15 week intervention. We assessed pelvic floor 3D ultrasound parameters, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, pelvic floor muscle strength metrics, and symptom scores pre- and post-treatment.

resultsThis analysis included 240 patients. The PFMT-EMS group showed significantly greater improvement in key ultrasound parameters, including a smaller levator ani hiatus area on Valsalva (P < 0.001) and reduced bladder neck descent (P < 0.001). This group also achieved better POP-Q stage improvement (P = 0.013), greater enhancement in muscle strength and symptom relief (all P < 0.001), and a higher total effective rate (P = 0.027).

conclusionCombining PFMT with EMS produces superior anatomical and functional outcomes in elderly women with POP than PFMT alone.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyMagnetic Field TherapyPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMuscle StrengthRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyElderly womenElectromagnetic stimulationPelvic floor muscle trainingPelvic organ prolapseThree-dimensional ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42141315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.