Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141242›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026

Multiple consecutive sphincter-preserving procedures improve overall healing outcomes in transsphincteric fistulae: a prospective cohort study of 101 patients.

E Anand, A Senapati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E AnandSt Mark's The National Bowel Hospital, Acton Lane, London, UK. era24@ic.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-5931
A SenapatiSt Mark's The National Bowel Hospital, Acton Lane, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of complex transsphincteric fistulae is challenging and surgical repair must be balanced against the risk of continence impairment. This study aims to demonstrate that multiple, carefully selected procedures can achieve long-term clinical healing without sphincter division for the majority of patients in this cohort.

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study in a large university hospital with a dedicated colorectal surgery unit. Patients underwent between one and four sphincter-preserving procedures, including advancement flap (AF), ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), and fistula plug placement. The primary outcome was overall clinical healing at the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of incontinence and the success rates of individual sphincter-preserving procedures.

resultsOut of 120 patients, 101 were eligible for final analysis. The mean patient age was 43.3 years, with a median follow-up duration of 21 months (IQR 11-31). The overall clinical healing rate was 90.1% (91/101), achieved after a mean of 1.6 procedures (SD 0.85, Range 1-4). Among patients who did not undergo sphincter division, the healing rate was 88.4% (76/86). The advancement flap demonstrated the highest success rate (85.7%), compared with LIFT (56%) and plug (38.8%) as first-stage procedures, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.007).

conclusionsComplex transsphincteric fistulae can be successfully treated with a 90.1% success rate using a combination of sphincter-preserving surgical procedures. Patients should be informed of the likelihood of multiple operations to achieve long-term healing.

Indexed as

Anal CanalOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRectal FistulaAdultColorectal Surgical ProceduresFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurgical FlapsTreatment OutcomeAdvancement flapFistula plugLIFTPerianal fistulaTranssphincteric fistula

Identifiers

PMID42141242
PMCPMC13346365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.