Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141230›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2026

Ultrasound imaging in aesthetic medicine: safety and precision in injectable procedures.

Francesca Arrigoni, Stefania Belletti, Corrado Caiazzo, Maurizio Cavallini, Andrea Cordovana, Andrea De Santis, Alessandra Ferla Lodigiani, Riccardo Lazzari, Mario Mariotti, Valentina Merenda and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesca Arrigoni *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy. f.arrigoni@agora.clinic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0467-6602
Stefania Belletti *Focus Group "Ultrasound", Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Corrado Caiazzo *SIUMB-Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 00192, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-2692
Maurizio Cavallini *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-6258
Andrea Cordovana *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Andrea De Santis *Focus Group "Ultrasound", Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8569-3594
Alessandra Ferla Lodigiani *Focus Group "Ultrasound", Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo Lazzari *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Mario Mariotti *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Valentina Merenda *Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Via San Francesco D'Assisi 4/A, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Marco Francesco Papagni *Focus Group "Ultrasound", Agorà-Italian Society of Aesthetic Medicine, 20122, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injectable procedures for aesthetic purposes are on the rise in recent years, and, with them, the number of related complications. Ultrasound (US) imaging is a reliable tool that can be used in conjunction with such procedures to minimize adverse outcomes. US may be used prior to the actual injection procedure to identify anatomical anomalies and for vascular mapping. US-guided injections allow to improve precision, prevent complications, reduce the injectable volume, and to treat complications. At follow-up, US imaging allows assessment of treatment success by visualizing filler placement but is also essential for diagnosing complications and carefully planning their treatment. However, a lack of standardized protocols persists, forcing practitioners to determine US use on an individual basis. This review examines the application of US before, during, and after injectable procedures, highlighting its benefits in preventing and managing complications. We focus on the literature published since 2020, thereby providing a snapshot of current clinical practice. US imaging at different stages of injectable procedures allows precise treatments, tailored to individual patients' needs, minimizes complications, enhances practitioner confidence and patient' trust, and ultimately achieves optimal aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Ultimately, this review highlights the need to develop standardized protocols for the implementation of US in routine clinical practice, supporting practitioners in their decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersUltrasonography, InterventionalEstheticsHumansInjectionsUltrasonographyDermal FillersBotulinum neurotoxinComplicationsCosmetic medicineFillersHyaluronic acidVascular mapping

Identifiers

PMID42141230
PMCPMC13250107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.