ReviewJournal of ultrasound2026
Ultrasound imaging in aesthetic medicine: safety and precision in injectable procedures.
Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Guidelines for ultrasound in aesthetic medicine: a narrative review.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injectable procedures for aesthetic purposes are on the rise in recent years, and, with them, the number of related complications. Ultrasound (US) imaging is a reliable tool that can be used in conjunction with such procedures to minimize adverse outcomes. US may be used prior to the actual injection procedure to identify anatomical anomalies and for vascular mapping. US-guided injections allow to improve precision, prevent complications, reduce the injectable volume, and to treat complications. At follow-up, US imaging allows assessment of treatment success by visualizing filler placement but is also essential for diagnosing complications and carefully planning their treatment. However, a lack of standardized protocols persists, forcing practitioners to determine US use on an individual basis. This review examines the application of US before, during, and after injectable procedures, highlighting its benefits in preventing and managing complications. We focus on the literature published since 2020, thereby providing a snapshot of current clinical practice. US imaging at different stages of injectable procedures allows precise treatments, tailored to individual patients' needs, minimizes complications, enhances practitioner confidence and patient' trust, and ultimately achieves optimal aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Ultimately, this review highlights the need to develop standardized protocols for the implementation of US in routine clinical practice, supporting practitioners in their decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.