Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141215›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026

Percutaneous ALPITube ileostomy for colorectal anastomotic protection: a multicentre feasibility study.

Carolina Germanetti, P Mezzatesta, Tomás Elosua González, B Defrancisco, B Mussa

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolina GermanettiSurgical Science Department, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
P MezzatestaLa Maddalena Oncological Center, Palermo, Italy.
Tomás Elosua GonzálezComplejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Instituto de InvestigaciónBiosanitaria de León (IBIOLEÓN), León, España.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9869-2281
B DefranciscoSurgical Science Department, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
B MussaSurgical Science Department, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy. baudolino.mussa@unito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard loop ileostomy protects low colorectal anastomoses but causes substantial stoma-related morbidity including dehydration, high-output syndrome and metabolic complications. The Anastomotic Leak Prevention Ileostomy Tube (ALPITube) is a novel CE-marked percutaneous diversion device designed to provide anastomotic protection while avoiding traditional stoma complications.

objectiveTo evaluate the technical feasibility, safety profile and preliminary outcomes of ALPITube in an idea, development, exploration, assessment and long-term study (IDEAL) framework Stage 2a development study, with contextual comparison to published loop ileostomy benchmarks.

methodsMulticentre retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with low anastomosis and ALPITube diversion at two European centres - Clinica La Maddalena in Palermo, Italy (n = 28), and Hospital HM Regla in León, Spain (n = 15) - between May 2023 and June 2025. Primary outcome was 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included device-specific adverse events, conversion to standard ileostomy and mortality.

resultsForty-three patients were analysed (mean age 69.7 ± 9.0 years; 88.4% with ≥ 1 comorbidity; 76.7% received neoadjuvant therapy). Device implantation was technically successful in all cases (mean implantation time 38 ± 14 min). Early complications occurred in 21 patients (48.8%), and were predominantly low-grade (Clavien-Dindo I-II: 25.6%). In total, five patients (11.6%) required conversion to loop ileostomy due to device maintenance difficulties. No anastomotic leaks or high-output syndrome occurred. No adverse events were associated with device removal. Contextual comparison with literature benchmarks suggested lower rates of high-output stoma (0% versus 16%), exit-site skin complications (18.6% versus 43%), postoperative ileus (4.7% versus 33%) and parastomal hernia (0% versus 8%).

conclusionsALPITube demonstrates technical feasibility with an acceptable safety profile and signals potential reduction in stoma-specific complications. The 11.6% conversion rate reflects early implementation experience. These IDEAL Stage 2a findings support progression to prospective comparative studies.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakIleostomyRectumAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalColorectal Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic protectionIDEAL frameworkMinimally invasive surgeryProtective ileostomyRectal surgeryStoma complicationsSurgical innovation

Identifiers

PMID42141215
PMCPMC13346299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.