ArticleProtoplasma2026
Autophagy is more vital in tomato and citrus than in arabidopsis.
Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autophagy is crucial for plant growth, development, and stress responses. While its core machinery is conserved across species, the differential regulation of autophagy in annual versus perennial plants, particularly with respect to resource allocation trade-offs, remains poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comparative study to investigate the function of autophagy in horticultural plants with different life cycles. Using autophagy-deficient materials targeting ATG7 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and citrus (Fortunella hindsii), alongside Arabidopsis as a reference, we analysed the impact of autophagy on vegetative growth, reproductive development, and nutrient stress responses. The results show that autophagy deficiency consistently impaired growth across species, but F. hindsii exhibited more severe growth inhibition and premature leaf senescence, highlighting variation in reliance on autophagy. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of F. hindsii further revealed potential molecular networks underlying autophagy deficiency-induced leaf senescence. In conclusion, our study provides evidence of how autophagy functions differently across plant species, offering a theoretical foundation for future autophagy-based breeding approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42141194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.