ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
CFD study on deposition pattern of adult oropharyngeal drug particles with inhalation devices using realistic anatomical models under steady-state flow.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWith the rising burden of chronic respiratory diseases, inhalation therapy is essential for efficient drug delivery, yet oropharyngeal retention still limits effective lung deposition. Delivery efficiency depends strongly on the inhaler type, the oropharyngeal geometry, and the relative positioning. This study aims to analyze these factors, particularly the angle of inhalation between the device and the airway.
methodsReal adult mouth-throat models combined with Breezhaler® and Handihaler® devices were developed. Particle deposition under steady-state inhalation conditions was analyzed using the discrete phase modeling (DPM) method.
resultsThe two devices exhibit distinct flow behaviors: Handihaler® produces higher resistance and stronger vortices, which increase oral deposition, whereas Breezhaler® maintains a more stable flow field. Oropharyngeal geometry, particularly tongue elevation, drives variations in deposition by enhancing turbulence. Significantly, the relative location and inhaler orientation angle are decisive determinants. A non-parallel incident angle significantly reduces aerodynamic resistance above the tongue and mitigates intense airflow impact, though it may cause localized vortex formation. The analysis indicates that higher values for the relative location factors (L
conclusionsThe Breezhaler® demonstrates lower simulated oropharyngeal deposition compared to the Handihaler® due to lower aerodynamic resistance and a more stable flow field within the evaluated models. Additionally, optimizing the relative location by modifying the inhalation angle could significantly reduce drug losses. These findings suggest that selecting the appropriate device type and controlling its orientation are critical for enhancing targeted pulmonary delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42141173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.