Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141173›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2026

CFD study on deposition pattern of adult oropharyngeal drug particles with inhalation devices using realistic anatomical models under steady-state flow.

Yingzhe Ding, Shiqi Wang, Shufan Liu, Guobin Gong, Zhenbo Tong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingzhe DingDepartment of Civil Engineering, Design School, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU), Suzhou, 215123, China.
Shiqi WangSchool of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Shufan LiuSchool of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Guobin GongDepartment of Civil Engineering, Design School, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU), Suzhou, 215123, China. Guobin.Gong@xjtlu.edu.cn.
Zhenbo TongSchool of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China. z.tong@seu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-443X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82274007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the rising burden of chronic respiratory diseases, inhalation therapy is essential for efficient drug delivery, yet oropharyngeal retention still limits effective lung deposition. Delivery efficiency depends strongly on the inhaler type, the oropharyngeal geometry, and the relative positioning. This study aims to analyze these factors, particularly the angle of inhalation between the device and the airway.

methodsReal adult mouth-throat models combined with Breezhaler® and Handihaler® devices were developed. Particle deposition under steady-state inhalation conditions was analyzed using the discrete phase modeling (DPM) method.

resultsThe two devices exhibit distinct flow behaviors: Handihaler® produces higher resistance and stronger vortices, which increase oral deposition, whereas Breezhaler® maintains a more stable flow field. Oropharyngeal geometry, particularly tongue elevation, drives variations in deposition by enhancing turbulence. Significantly, the relative location and inhaler orientation angle are decisive determinants. A non-parallel incident angle significantly reduces aerodynamic resistance above the tongue and mitigates intense airflow impact, though it may cause localized vortex formation. The analysis indicates that higher values for the relative location factors (L

conclusionsThe Breezhaler® demonstrates lower simulated oropharyngeal deposition compared to the Handihaler® due to lower aerodynamic resistance and a more stable flow field within the evaluated models. Additionally, optimizing the relative location by modifying the inhalation angle could significantly reduce drug losses. These findings suggest that selecting the appropriate device type and controlling its orientation are critical for enhancing targeted pulmonary delivery.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNebulizers and VaporizersOropharynxAdministration, InhalationAerosolsEquipment DesignHumansHydrodynamicsModels, AnatomicModels, BiologicalParticle SizeAerosolsDeposition distributionDPMFlow fieldInhalation devicesMouth and throat models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.