ArticleScientific reports2026
Transformer-based iris verification with attention-guided segmentation and Siamese learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a transformer-based Siamese framework for iris verification that integrates image enhancement, attention-guided segmentation, and global feature learning within a unified pipeline. A deep denoising autoencoder is employed to improve image quality, followed by an attention-guided U-Net for precise iris localization. Global feature representations are extracted using a Vision Transformer, enabling the modeling of long-range dependencies across iris textures, and are optimized through contrastive learning to enhance discriminability. The proposed framework is evaluated on the CASIA-IrisV3 dataset, including the Interval, Lamp, and Twins subsets, under a subject-disjoint verification protocol. Experimental results achieve an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 2.34% and an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.987, with a True Acceptance Rate of approximately 95% at a False Acceptance Rate of 10⁻³. The method attains a verification accuracy of 97.82% while maintaining efficient inference with an average latency of 12.6 ms per comparison. These results indicate consistent performance across varying acquisition conditions within the near-infrared domain, demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating attention-guided segmentation and transformer-based representations for iris verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.