ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of indoor physical environment and psychosocial stress on work performance in a Thai academic setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While physical indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and psychosocial stress are known to affect employee well-being, their combined influence on multidimensional work performance remains underexplored, particularly within academic medical settings in Southeast Asia. To address this gap, this cross-sectional study investigated the associations between specific work performance domains and both physical and psychosocial environments among office workers in a Thai academic medical institute. A survey was conducted among 419 administrative staff members (51.16% response rate) employed for over six months. Participants completed paper-based questionnaires assessing: (1) demographics, (2) physical indoor environment perceptions (7-point Likert scale), (3) psychosocial environment (Thai Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire), and (4) work performance (Individual Work Performance Questionnaire). Multiple linear regression analyzed relationships between these factors and three performance domains: task performance (TP), contextual performance (CP), and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). While TP was negatively associated with male gender (β = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.03), CP was significantly hindered by perceived stagnant air movement (β = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.02) and facilitated by adequate privacy (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.11). Furthermore, high-risk effort-reward imbalance was a strong predictor of lower CWB scores (β = -0.26, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.07), indicating that highly stressed individuals engaged in more frequent counterproductive behaviors. These findings demonstrate that physical and psychosocial factors are significantly associated with specific performance dimensions. Specifically, poor air movement and a lack of privacy are linked to lower contextual performance, while work stress is positively correlated with counterproductive behavior. Consequently, institutional policies should prioritize improving ventilation, enhancing workplace privacy, and balancing effort-reward structures to optimize staff productivity and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.