ReviewNPJ digital medicine2026
AI-PACE: a framework for integrating AI into medical education.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From compliance to competence: a multi-level model for AI governance in undergraduate medical education.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- What and when: a Delphi study identifying AI competencies and learning objectives for medical students.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI literacy in undergraduate medical education: a competency-based interpretive framework for curriculum and assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology education: transformative applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The Long road to AI-physician partnership starts with learners: a map for AI in medical education.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical AI education remains fragmented, specialty-skewed, and lacks longitudinal structure, particularly for generalist physicians. Through an integrative review of 23 peer-reviewed articles (2016-2025), we identified three structural gaps: short-term interventions without reinforcement, procedural-field bias, and consistent under-representation of the Affective domain. We present AI-PACE (Psychomotor, Affective, Cognitive, Embedded), a Bloom's Taxonomy-grounded framework organizing AI competencies longitudinally across undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.