ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis for health risk management in water distribution networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leakages and breaks in water distribution networks (WDNs) cause significant water losses and pose health risks due to pathogen intrusion. The Water Safety Plan (WSP), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a comprehensive framework for identifying, assessing, and controlling risks within water supply systems. This study demonstrates the application of the WSP framework through a case study of a WDN in Sweden. Pipe break probabilities were estimated using three classification models: Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), while hydraulic and health consequences were evaluated using hydraulic modelling and Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) to quantify the overall health risk. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach, specifically the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was utilized to prioritize risk mitigation strategies through breakage and leakage control measures. The proposed approach integrates predictive modelling, consequence evaluation, and decision analysis, offering a structured method for water utilities in prioritizing interventions and improving the overall safety and reliability of WDNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.