Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141061›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrating machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis for health risk management in water distribution networks.

Uchit Sangroula, Victor Viñas, Michael Odhiambo, Thomas J R Pettersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uchit SangroulaDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Water Environment Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Sweden. uchit@chalmers.se.
Victor ViñasDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Water Environment Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Sweden.
Michael OdhiamboDepartment of Urban Water Engineering, Norconsult AB, Gothenburg, SE-402 76, Sweden.
Thomas J R PetterssonDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Water Environment Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leakages and breaks in water distribution networks (WDNs) cause significant water losses and pose health risks due to pathogen intrusion. The Water Safety Plan (WSP), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a comprehensive framework for identifying, assessing, and controlling risks within water supply systems. This study demonstrates the application of the WSP framework through a case study of a WDN in Sweden. Pipe break probabilities were estimated using three classification models: Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), while hydraulic and health consequences were evaluated using hydraulic modelling and Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) to quantify the overall health risk. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach, specifically the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was utilized to prioritize risk mitigation strategies through breakage and leakage control measures. The proposed approach integrates predictive modelling, consequence evaluation, and decision analysis, offering a structured method for water utilities in prioritizing interventions and improving the overall safety and reliability of WDNs.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesMachine LearningRisk ManagementWater SupplyBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk AssessmentSwedenDecision makingHealth risksWater distribution networksWater safety plan

Identifiers

PMID42141061
PMCPMC13190735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.