ArticleScientific reports2026
Transcriptomic and functional responses of human airway cells to vaped ∆8-THC and its oxidation product ∆8-THCQ.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC) products have expanded rapidly since the 2018 Farm Bill, yet they remain largely unregulated despite containing high cannabinoid levels, additives, and contaminants, and growing evidence of respiratory risks. We identify the reactive electrophile Δ8-THC quinone (Δ8-THCQ, HU-336) as a major constituent of commercial Δ8-THC distillates and disposable vape products, with concentrations increasing substantially after vaping. Across high-potency products, Δ8-THCQ rose an average of 3.67-fold, reaching millimolar levels. While Δ8-THC alone did not elicit a statistically distinct transcriptomic signature from the vehicle control in a bronchial epithelial cell line, Δ8-THCQ caused marked gene-expression changes, activating cilia-related, stress-response, xenobiotic-metabolism, and inflammatory pathways. Using primary differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells and the UNC Vaping Product Exposure System (VaPES), we found that aerosols from commercial Δ8-THC mixtures rapidly induced immediate-early stress genes, suppressed ribosomal and mitochondrial programs, and activated fibrosis-linked signaling. In contrast, Δ8-THC-containing "juice" products had milder effects, mainly upregulating cell-cycle and proliferation pathways. Computational analyses linked the chemical composition of Δ8-THC aerosols to distinct transcriptional responses, identifying clusters of compounds driving specific airway effects. Functionally, distillate and disposable aerosols impaired motile-cilia activity. Collectively, these findings indicate that vaping generates substantial Δ8-THCQ and suggest that repeated inhalation may disrupt mucociliary defense and raise concern for chronic airway injury warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.