Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Class-incremental few-shot underwater object detection framework.

Xue Zhao, Bin Zhou, Yanjiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255000, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhouSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255000, People's Republic of China. freetzb@163.com.
Yanjiang WangCollege of Control Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underwater object detection is vital for marine exploration and ecological monitoring. However, due to the low-quality original characteristics of underwater images, the diversity changes of underwater species, and the scarcity of samples, existing underwater object detection technologies struggle to address these challenges simultaneously. To this end, this paper proposes a class-incremental few-shot underwater object detection framework(CIFS-UD). First, we design an end-to-end multi-task architecture by integrating the existing underwater image enhancement module based on the deep inception and channel-wise attention (DICAM) and object detection, enhancing underwater visual quality and enabling more discriminative feature representations. Second, we develop a prototype-based multi-scale dual attention module (ProMSDA) that strengthens cross-scale feature correlations and key object regions to optimize class prototype representations. Finally, we propose a dynamic boundary-aware prototype collaboration optimization strategy (DB-PCO) that jointly constrains intra-class compactness and inter-class separability to alleviate catastrophic forgetting. Experiments on Brackish, Trashcan, and RUOD datasets verify that CIFS-UD can effectively adapt to novel classes and improve the class-incremental few-shot underwater object detection performance.The code and implementation are publicly available at https://github.com/snow102/Class-Incremental-Few-Shot-Underwater-Object-Detection-Framework .

Indexed as

Attention mechanismClass-incremental learningFew-shot learningPrototype learningUnderwater object detection

Identifiers

PMID42141041
PMCPMC13369365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.