Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141040›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Neural grid control systems with predictive transient stability enhancement enabling 100 percent renewable integration through distributed intelligence and real time topology reconfiguration.

Zhiliang Cui, Yuze Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiliang CuiChina Agricultural Vet.Bio.Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Lanzhou, 730046, People's Republic of China.
Yuze LiangBeijing-Dublin International College, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. lyz200438@emails.bjut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The galloping movement toward completely renewable power systems means that new control architectures are needed that can cope with increased variability to date whilst maintaining short-lived stability in low-inertia networks. This paper presents a Neural Grid Control System (NGCS) that combines physics-informed graph attention networks with hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning to provide enhanced predictive transient stability and achieve real-time topology reconfiguration. The proposed architecture uses a spatiotemporal graph encoder, which is able to capture the dynamic electrical coupling at grid-forming converter-dominated networks and embeds the physical constraints of swing equation within the learning architecture to ensure physical consistency. An intelligent layer with novel distributed intelligence enables autonomous agents at the autonomous substation level to synchronize topology-switching behavior using consensus-based communication schemes, where a centralized meta-controller coordinates system-wide stability goals. The proposed NGCS demonstrates 94.7% transient stability classification accuracy, achieves inference in 12 ms, and provides a 340 computational speedup compared to conventional time-domain simulation, enabling real-time topology reconfiguration in fully inverter-based grids. These results indicate that NGCS is a promising framework for fast transient-stability assessment and coordinated corrective control in converter-dominated power systems.

Indexed as

Distributed controlGrid-forming convertersLow-inertia power systemsMulti-agent reinforcement learningPhysics-informed neural networksRenewable energy integrationTopology optimizationTransient stability

Identifiers

PMID42141040
PMCPMC13369744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.