Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141032›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Functional flexibility in bacterial hub proteins is driven by proteome expansion.

Mladen Paradžik, Stefani Prekpalaj, Tina Paradžik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mladen ParadžikLaboratory of Experimental Therapy, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Stefani PrekpalajLaboratory for chemical and biological crystallography, Division of physical chemistry, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tina ParadžikLaboratory for chemical and biological crystallography, Division of physical chemistry, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia. Tina.Paradzik@irb.hr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction networks play a key role in the living cells, with hub proteins (hubs) acting as central nodes in the transmission of biological signals. The features enabling hubs to interact with other proteins in bacteria remain unexplored. We present the first cross-phylum analysis of bacterial hubs using AlphaFold and IUPred. Hubs exhibit higher levels of intrinsic disorder compared to whole proteomes. In contrast to the highly structured proteomes of obligate pathogens, proteomes of free-living bacterial species are more disordered. We show that proteome size is a stronger predictor of disorder accumulation than GC content. Analyses of conserved orthologous hubs show that protein cores are conserved in sequence, 3D structure and length, accumulating disorder in terminal regions in bacteria with large proteomes. Analysis of the Escherichia coli interactome shows that 63% of proteins with disorder (> 30 AA) have more than 10 known interaction partners, compared to 19% of fully structured proteins, emphasizing the functional importance of disorder in bacteria. Our results indicate that intrinsic disorder in bacterial proteins is associated with proteome complexity and cannot be explained by GC content alone. Disorder expansion in complex bacteria may contribute to interaction plasticity in different environments similar to those in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsProteomeEscherichia coliProtein Interaction MapsBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID42141032
PMCPMC13369152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.