Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141028›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Adaptive patch sampling and location-aware reasoning for whole body PET-CT multi-organ segmentation.

Junha Park, Arthur Cho, Hae-Jeong Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junha ParkYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Arthur ChoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hae-Jeong ParkYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. parkhj@yonsei.ac.kr.

Funding

a Severance Hospital Research fund for Clinical excellence (SHRC) C-2023-0020National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) No. RS-2024-00401794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patch-wise learning is a common strategy for training neural networks on large-scale dense prediction problems, yet existing approaches assume uniform or fixed sampling distributions. This assumption is suboptimal when learning difficulty varies spatially and evolves with the model state during optimization. We reformulate patch-wise learning as a dynamic computation allocation problem and propose an adaptive patch sampling (APS) algorithm that learns where to sample by constructing model-state-dependent sampling distributions from voxel-wise uncertainty and prediction error. To learn what contextual information is encoded within sampled patches, we introduce a patch encoding (PE) block that infers implicit location information and modulates feature representations through context-dependent channel-wise attention, without relying on explicit spatial coordinates. Experiments on whole-body multi-organ PET-CT segmentation demonstrate faster convergence and consistent performance gains, with external validation on Synapse dataset confirming robustness. Mechanistic analyses of learning dynamics further characterize sampling behavior induced by APS and representation modulation driven by the PE block through attention analysis and causal channel pruning. Overall, this work contributes an efficient learning strategy for patch-wise training and provides insight into how dynamic sampling and contextual conditioning influence optimization in large-scale dense prediction tasks.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyWhole Body ImagingAdaptive AlgorithmsAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID42141028
PMCPMC13377078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.