ArticleScientific reports2026
Shear performance of slender reinforced concrete beams: an analysis of various international standards.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance and design of reinforced concrete, also known as slender beams are explained in the current study by a number of international codes. Slender beams are essential in modern construction because they preserve structural integrity while allowing for efficient material use. This research conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear design provisions for slender reinforced concrete beams across major international standards, including ECP, ACI, Eurocode, CSA, BS, and JSCE. The innovation lies in systematically identifying differences and commonalities in methodologies related to shear capacity determination, minimum reinforcement requirements, and serviceability criteria. By addressing the current gap of exhaustive analyses needed to standardize criteria and resolve methodological discrepancies, the work aims to enhance the reliability, effectiveness, and uniformity of global shear design processes for slender beams. This comparative approach is intended to assist engineers and academics in making more informed design decisions, thereby improving the efficiency, structural integrity, and safety of slender beam applications in modern construction. In summary, the novel contribution is the exhaustive and systematic comparison of various international design codes concerning slender RC beam shear design. Identification of inconsistencies and variations that affect structural security and design efficiency. Providing insights that could aid in harmonization and standardization of shear design provisions worldwide. Offering recommendations towards achieving more consistent, safe, and economical slender beam designs in contemporary construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.