Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42141016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dynamic neural representations of scene beauty are relatively unaffected by stimulus timing and task.

Sanjeev Nara, Lara Becker, Lilly Hillebrand, Rongming Xiang, Daniel Kaiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjeev NaraNeural Computation Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. sanjeevnara@iitmandi.ac.in.
Lara BeckerDepartment of Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Lilly HillebrandDepartment of Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Rongming XiangNeural Computation Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Daniel KaiserNeural Computation Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural correlates of aesthetic experiences in natural environments is a central question in neuroaesthetics. A previous EEG study (Kaiser, 2022) identified early and temporally sustained neural representations of visual scene beauty. These results were obtained with long presentation durations (1450 ms) and with explicit beauty judgments, rendering it unclear how presentation time and task demands shape the neural correlates of scene beauty. In two EEG experiments, we replicated this study while varying presentation time and task. Experiment 1 tested whether reducing stimulus presentation time from 1450 ms to 100 ms altered neural representations of beauty. Experiment 2 examined whether beauty-related representations prevailed when participants performed an orthogonal task instead of explicitly judging beauty. Representational similarity analysis revealed that beauty-related neural representations emerged early (within 150-200 ms post-stimulus) and were sustained over time, in line with previous findings. Critically, we found that neither reduced presentation time nor the absence of an explicit beauty judgment significantly altered beauty-related neural dynamics. These results suggest that the neural correlates of scene beauty are relatively robust to stimulus presentation and task regimes, providing a potential correlate of the spontaneous perception of beauty in natural environments.

Indexed as

BeautyVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42141016
PMCPMC13179325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.