Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Sustainable science mapping: benchmarking green AI against transformers for cross-disciplinary abstract classification using arXiv.

Mehmet Ali Erkan, Ceylan Yozgatlıgil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet Ali Erkan *Department of Statistics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey. maerkan@metu.edu.tr.
Ceylan Yozgatlıgil *Department of Statistics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential growth of scholarly literature necessitates automated, scalable systems for organizing knowledge domains. However, text classification of academic abstracts presents distinct challenges due to specialized terminology and diverse discourse structures across disciplines. This study proposes a resource efficient deep learning methodology to categorize academic abstracts, scaling from coarse grained domains (arXiv) to fine grained disciplinary hierarchies (Web of Science). Systematic comparative analysis of Recurrent Neural Networks (Attention-GRU) and Transformer based architectures (BERT, SciBERT) are conducted, specifically focusing on the trade-off between predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Extensive experiments on massive benchmarks that include the WOS-46985 dataset with 134 sub-disciplines, reveal a notable finding: Our proposed Attention-based GRU model utilizing static GloVe embeddings achieved a Macro-F1 score of 0.920, achieving higher performance than leading domain specific models such as SciBERT (F1: 0.867). Furthermore, this accuracy was achieved with over 3× faster training times and significantly lower estimated energy proxy compared to Transformer variants. This research contributes to the field by providing a systematic evaluation of "Green AI" architectures, demonstrating that computationally efficient models can robustly handle the linguistic diversity of high cardinality, fine grained scientific taxonomies without the prohibitive estimated energy costs of Large Language Models.

Indexed as

Academic text classificationAutomated subject indexingComputational efficiencyDeep learning in bibliometricGreen AI

Identifiers

PMID42140999
PMCPMC13369809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.