ArticleScientific reports2026
How semantic context and temporal dynamics affect egocentric and allocentric spatial representations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental Modulation of Perceived Cognitive Workload During a Memory Task: Evidence from Immersive Virtual Reality.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pouring water from a bottle into a glass requires representing their relative spatial positions (spatial information) and knowing that such objects are found together, or one by one (temporal dynamics), in typical contexts, such as a kitchen (semantic information).While spatial information is encoded using egocentric (body-centered) or allocentric (object-centered) reference frames, semantic knowledge is organized in context frames, which help predict object-context associations. This study investigates whether daily-like semantic contexts and temporal dynamics affect egocentric and allocentric spatial representations. Participants were immersed in semantically meaningless (abstract) or meaningful (bathroom, kitchen) virtual environments. They memorized triads of objects presented either simultaneously (static condition) or sequentially (dynamic condition) and then provided egocentric or allocentric spatial judgments. Results revealed an improvement of allocentric accuracy in meaningful rather than meaningless environments, whereas no differences emerged for egocentric spatial judgments. Crucially, this semantic benefit for allocentric encoding emerged only in the dynamic condition, where spatial information had to be integrated over time. These findings show that semantic context selectively facilitates allocentric spatial representations, particularly when perceptual input unfolds dynamically. The results support the interaction between semantic and spatial memory to shape how we perceive the surrounding world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.