Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automated Global Positioning Layout (GPL) for accuracy assessment in CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction - method introduction.

Elisa Vargiu, Giorgia Menapace, Giordana Bettini, Laura Tognin, Francesca Uccheddu, Giorgia Saia, Giorgio Bedogni, Roberto Meneghello, Alberto Bedogni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisa VargiuDepartment of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Padova, Italy. elisa.vargiu@phd.unipd.it.
Giorgia MenapaceUnit of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Head and Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giordana BettiniMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, ''S. Anna'' Hospital, Como, Italy.
Laura TogninUnit of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Head and Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesca UcchedduDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Giorgia SaiaDepartment of Neuroscience, Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Giorgio BedogniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum- University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto Meneghello *Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Alberto Bedogni *Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing accuracy in CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction poses significant challenges but is essential for ensuring reliable outcomes. Existing methods are often operator-dependent, lacking repeatability and reproducibility. This study introduces the Global Positioning Layout (GPL) method, an accuracy assessment technique integrated into the reconstruction protocol based on CAD-CAM and additive printing technology. We describe its methodology and present its implementation through an automated workflow. Key principles of accuracy assessment were identified and structured as Requirements, Data input, Data reference system, and Data output. The necessary 3D virtual models were defined: planned mandible, reference mandible, patient-specific implant (PSI), postoperative mandible, and postoperative PSI. A unique coordinate system (GPL-RS) was built on the reference mandible. Three Roto-Translational Matrices (RTMs) were applied to measure movements and deviations between the designed and postoperative models to assess reconstruction accuracy. Five clinical cases with different operational diseases and defects were analysed, comparing spatial deviations between manual and automated methods. The GPL method represents a promising advancement in assessing the accuracy of CAD-CAM reconstructions, providing valuable insights that can improve surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignMandibleMandibular ReconstructionHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrinting, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsAssessment of accuracyAutomatizationComputer-aided designComputer-aided manufacturingComputer-assisted surgeryMandibular reconstructionPatient-specific implant

Identifiers

PMID42140991
PMCPMC13369204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.