ArticleScientific reports2026
Canonical coherence for the estimation of within- and cross-frequency cortico-kinematic interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cortico-kinematic coherence (CKC) quantifies coupling between cortical activity and movement kinematics, serving as a non-invasive marker of sensorimotor integration and motor control. Conventional CKC approaches primarily assess within (linear) frequency coupling and overlook cross-frequency interactions, which are increasingly recognized as central to corticomuscular communication. We present a novel multivariate framework that extends the canonical coherence (caCOH) method by applying a non-linear warping of peripheral measures, enabling detection of cross-frequency CKC. The method jointly analyzes multichannel EEG and acceleration signals, maximizing sensitivity to spatially distributed neural sources while accounting for frequency-specific structure. Simulations with realistic head modeling show that the approach robustly recovers underlying patterns even at very low signal-to-noise ratios, closely matching the ground truth. Application to empirical EEG and acceleration data demonstrates that cross-frequency CKC is statistically significant in most participants and interaction pairs, indicating consistent non-random coupling. We further introduce an analysis strategy to determine whether observed interactions arise from shared (e.g. due to the signal shape) or distinct cortical sources. This framework provides a multivariate tool for characterizing the neural mechanisms of motor control and offers future opportunities for investigating their disruption in neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.