ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent hybrid decision support systems for education policy and institutional performance optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of digital technologies has accelerated the transition toward Education 5.0, where intelligent systems support advanced learning environments and data-driven institutional management. However, selecting the most effective educational technologies remains a complex decision-making problem due to uncertainty, conflicting criteria, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders. To address this challenge, this study proposes an intelligent hybrid decision-support framework based on picture fuzzy sets to manage uncertainty and hesitation in expert evaluations. The model integrates a mutual induction-based feature selection mechanism to identify the most influential criteria and determine their relative importance by capturing interrelationships among features. A novel distance and similarity measure for picture fuzzy information is also introduced to improve discrimination and accuracy in the evaluation process. The optimized criteria and weights are incorporated into a ranking procedure based on PROMETHEE II to evaluate and prioritize emerging Education 5.0 technologies. A real-world case study inspired by China's smart education transformation is conducted, assessing ten advanced educational technologies, including artificial intelligence learning systems, learning analytics platforms, and immersive learning environments. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulation is applied to assess uncertainty propagation and stochastic behavior, while robustness is evaluated by comparing the results with traditional methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOORA, MABAC, WASPAS, EDAS, and ARAS. The results demonstrate the superior stability and reliability of the proposed framework, providing actionable guidance for policymakers and educational institutions in strategic technology adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.