Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140978›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intelligent hybrid decision support systems for education policy and institutional performance optimization.

Qiao Zeng, Haoping Zhang, Caixia Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiao ZengSchool of Economics and Management, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science & Technology, Chongqing, 401524, China. 18875090895@163.com.
Haoping ZhangSchool of Management, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science & Technology, Chongqing, 401524, China.
Caixia LiSchool of Business, Chongqing College of Humanities, Science & Technology, Chongqing, 401524, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technologies has accelerated the transition toward Education 5.0, where intelligent systems support advanced learning environments and data-driven institutional management. However, selecting the most effective educational technologies remains a complex decision-making problem due to uncertainty, conflicting criteria, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders. To address this challenge, this study proposes an intelligent hybrid decision-support framework based on picture fuzzy sets to manage uncertainty and hesitation in expert evaluations. The model integrates a mutual induction-based feature selection mechanism to identify the most influential criteria and determine their relative importance by capturing interrelationships among features. A novel distance and similarity measure for picture fuzzy information is also introduced to improve discrimination and accuracy in the evaluation process. The optimized criteria and weights are incorporated into a ranking procedure based on PROMETHEE II to evaluate and prioritize emerging Education 5.0 technologies. A real-world case study inspired by China's smart education transformation is conducted, assessing ten advanced educational technologies, including artificial intelligence learning systems, learning analytics platforms, and immersive learning environments. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulation is applied to assess uncertainty propagation and stochastic behavior, while robustness is evaluated by comparing the results with traditional methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOORA, MABAC, WASPAS, EDAS, and ARAS. The results demonstrate the superior stability and reliability of the proposed framework, providing actionable guidance for policymakers and educational institutions in strategic technology adoption.

Indexed as

Aggregation operatorsDecision support systemFuzzy logicPerformance optimizationPROMETHEE IISimilarity measureSimulationUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42140978
PMCPMC13369903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.