ArticleNature communications2026
CRISPR-based environmental detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei identifies sanitation gaps and melioidosis risk in northeast Thailand.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental exposure to Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, remains poorly characterised due to the low sensitivity of conventional detection methods. Here, we develop CRISPR-BEEPs, a sensitive and resource-efficient CRISPR-based assay, and evaluate its performance against conventional culture-based plate inspection using double-qPCR as the reference standard. CRISPR-BEEPs demonstrated higher sensitivity (93.5% vs 19.4%) and high specificity (100% vs 98.0%). We apply the assay to water samples from natural and piped sources across 15,118 km² in northeast Thailand, collected from or near the households of 439 participants with melioidosis. We compared these with households of 190 participants with other bacterial infections and 506 healthy control participants living in the same endemic region who had never developed melioidosis. CRISPR-BEEPs detects B. pseudomallei in 73.3% of groundwater, 32.9% of surface water, and 26.2% of piped water samples, with results comparable to double-qPCR. The improved sensitivity reveals a significant association between environmental detection within 10 km of households and melioidosis risk (OR 2.74; 95% CI:1.38-5.48), an association undetectable using conventional methods. These findings expose critical sanitation gaps and highlight the value of high-resolution environmental surveillance for disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.