Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Media analysis reveals the conservation risk of lost and active fishing gear in freshwater ecosystems of Hungary.

Viktor Löki, Zsolt Neményi, Attila Hagyó, András Nagy, Zoltán Vitál, Tamás Malkócs, Balázs András Lukács, Attila Mozsár, Orsolya Vincze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Viktor LökiWetland Ecology Research Group, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, IAE, Bem tér 18/C, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary. loki.viktor@ecolres.hu.
Zsolt NeményiPál Juhász-Nagy Doctoral School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
Attila HagyóPál Juhász-Nagy Doctoral School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
András NagyPál Juhász-Nagy Doctoral School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
Zoltán VitálResearch Center for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Anna-liget u 35, Szarvas, 5540, Hungary.
Tamás MalkócsLittoral, Environnement Et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266, CNRS, La Rochelle Université, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, La Rochelle, France. tamas.malkocs@gmail.com.
Balázs András LukácsWetland Ecology Research Group, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, IAE, Bem tér 18/C, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.
Attila Mozsár *HUN-REN Balaton Limnological Research Institute, Klebelsberg Kuno utca 3., Tihany, 8237, Hungary.
Orsolya Vincze *Wetland Ecology Research Group, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, IAE, Bem tér 18/C, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bycatch by fishing gear is a major cause of biodiversity loss. While bycatch is relatively well studied in marine ecosystems, there is limited information available on the frequency and the importance of bycatch in freshwater habitats, and the breadth of wildlife taxa affected. To explore this question, we conducted research based on online resources, including four social media platforms. We recorded 200 cases of fishing gear interactions with animals (excluding fish) between 1984 and 2024 in Hungary, along with information on the affected species and the location of the event. A total of 226 individuals of 64 animal species were affected by bycatch. Birds were the most frequently affected (60.6%), followed by reptiles (27.9%), while other taxa accounted for a total of 11.5% of records. The majority (72.6%) of the 226 bycaught individuals belonged to taxa protected by Hungarian law. The overwhelming majority of cases (n = 192, 96.0%) involved only two types of fishing gear: lines and/or fishing hook. Lost fishing gear was responsible for the majority of entanglements (n = 111, 55.5%), but actively used fishing gear was responsible for a comparable number of cases (n = 86, 43%). Our study highlights that bycatch from lost or active fishing gear poses a potential conservation concern requiring systematic investigation in freshwater ecosystems. Many of the affected taxa include species of conservation concern, underscoring the ecological significance of these interactions. In summary, our study highlights the conservation implication of bycatch in freshwater ecosystems, and calls for evaluating the true magnitude of its impact, especially in areas of high conservation importance.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesFresh WaterAnimalsBiodiversityDigital MediaHungaryAnglersConservationFishingNon-target speciesThreatened species

Identifiers

PMID42140951
PMCPMC13179322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.