Trial reportNature communications2026
Carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03414684 (A Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin With or Without Nivolumab in First-line Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin With or Without Nivolumab in First-line Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This multi-institutional randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT03414684) investigated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus nivolumab compared to carboplatin in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population of patients with chemotherapy-naïve (i.e., first-line) mTNBC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), confirmed objective response rate, confirmed clinical benefit rate, time to and duration of confirmed objective response, safety, and tolerability. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in the PD-L1-positive subgroup ( ≥ 1% immune cells; SP142 clone) per central review. Biospecimens were collected for correlative analyses. 75 patients were enrolled and treated between 2/2018-9/2020. Among the mITT population (n = 62), median PFS was 4.2 months with carboplatin plus nivolumab vs 5.5 months with carboplatin. Median OS did not significantly differ between arms (16.8 vs 11.1 months, respectively). In PD-L1-positive mTNBC patients (n = 24), median PFS was 8.3 vs 4.7 months; median OS was 17.6 vs 10.7 months. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 56.8% of patients in the combination arm and 65.8% in the carboplatin arm. Carboplatin plus nivolumab did not significantly improve PFS compared to carboplatin in patients overall; however, a trend toward improved outcomes was observed in PD-L1-positive mTNBC patients. High mutational burden, interferon-gamma signaling, early circulating tumor DNA reduction, low baseline serum thymidine kinase activity, and urea cycle dysregulation in the microbiome emerged as potential predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.