Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140911›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Fast efficient coding and sensory adaptation in gain-adaptive recurrent networks.

Arthur Prat-Carrabin, Maximilian V Harl, Samuel J Gershman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design principles for cost functions in optimal sensory coding.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arthur Prat-CarrabinDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. arthurpc@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-1488
Maximilian V HarlNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7522-5296
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the statistics of sensory environments often change, neural sensory systems must adapt to maintain useful representations. Efficient coding prescribes that neuronal tuning curves should be optimized to the prior, but whether they can adapt rapidly is unclear. Empirically, tuning curves after repeated stimulus presentations exhibit 'adapter repulsion', whose underlying mechanism remains uncertain, and which contrasts with the 'prior attraction' expected under many efficient-coding models. We propose a gain-adaptive, recurrent sensory network model in which gains optimize an efficient-coding objective balancing accuracy and spiking cost. From the propagation of modulated gains throughout the network emerge quickly adaptive tuning curves. The model accounts for subtle adapter-repulsion effects under peaked priors and predicts fast prior attraction under broader distributions, for which we provide supporting behavioral evidence. Our framework reconciles seemingly contradictory adaptive phenomena, under a unified theoretical and mechanistic model of efficient coding mediated by gain modulation in recurrent circuits.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansRecurrent Neural Networks

Identifiers

PMID42140911
PMCPMC13291360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.