Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140890›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.

Kenta Suzuki, Masato Yamamichi, Yutaka Osada, Masayuki Ushio, Kohei Nakajima, Hiroshi Masuya, Shohei Shimizu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenta SuzukiIntegrated Bioresource Information Division, BioResource Research Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, 305-0074, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0639-2303
Masato YamamichiInstitute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, 240-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-3399
Yutaka OsadaAdvanced Institute for Marine Ecosystem Change, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8578, Miyagi, Japan.
Masayuki UshioDepartment of Ocean Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Kohei NakajimaGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MasuyaIntegrated Bioresource Information Division, BioResource Research Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, 305-0074, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shohei ShimizuCenter for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Chuo-ku, 103-0027, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR23N5Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K26933Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K03127Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K02036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in data collection technologies (e.g. automated sensor networks, satellite remote sensing, and high-throughput sequencing) have greatly expanded the availability of ecological time series, enabling new opportunities for causal analyses in dynamic ecosystems. Granger causality (GC) and convergent cross mapping (CCM), two prominent dynamical causal discovery methods, have gained attention in ecological studies for uncovering causal relationships in nonlinear systems. GC traces its roots to economics and was later extended through the information-theoretic framework of transfer entropy (TE). On the other hand, CCM was developed from studies of chaotic time series. Both methods have provided critical insights into the dynamics of complex systems. In this review, we synthesize foundational concepts and recent developments in GC and CCM, exploring their respective strengths and limitations, while clarifying their interrelationship. We also review recent advances in temporal causal discovery methods, originally developed within the framework of statistical causal inference for non-temporal data, and highlight their applicability to ecological data sets. Despite these advances, such approaches remain largely unfamiliar to ecologists. We argue that a rigorous framework of time-series-based causal inference, together with an appreciation of their diverse methodological developments to date, will not only raise awareness of unresolved challenges but also create new research opportunities in ecology. By offering an integrated perspective, we encourage the application and development of cutting-edge methods in ecology to help foster a deeper understanding of ecosystem dynamics.

Indexed as

EcologyEcosystemAnimalsTime Factorsconstraint‐based methodsconvergent cross mappingecological time seriesempirical dynamic modellingfunctional causal modelsGranger causalitynonlinear time series analysisscore‐based methodsstatistical causal inferencetransfer entropy

Identifiers

PMID42140890
PMCPMC13542360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.