Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140664›Full record

ReviewGenome research2026

Building genomic data structures from compressed representations using prefix-free parsing.

Rahul Varki, Christina Boucher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rahul VarkiDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA rvarki@ufl.edu.ORCID 0009-0003-5721-9484
Christina BoucherDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-9725

Funding

Personal and panel references for improved alignmentR01HG011392 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LANGMEAD, BENJAMIN THOMAS · 2020 to 2025
$4.2M
Fully Realizing Pangenomics AlignmentR56HG013865 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOUCHER, CHRISTINA, LANGMEAD, BENJAMIN THOMAS · 2024 to 2024
$645k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R56HG013865-01NHGRI NIH HHS 2R01HG011392-06NHGRI NIH HHS 5R01HG011392-05NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011392NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG013865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput sequencing have lowered the cost and complexity of genome sequencing, making it possible for the first time to assemble large pangenomic data sets for many species. These data sets, comprising thousands of individuals, already span from hundreds of gigabytes to petabytes, far exceeding the memory capacity of most machines, and are expected to continue growing in scale over time. Already, many traditional bioinformatics tools fail on inputs at this scale because they cannot construct their necessary data structures within memory limits. There is a growing need for methods that can construct these structures directly from compressed representations. Prefix-free parsing (PFP) addresses this challenge. PFP serves as a preprocessing step that compresses sufficiently repetitive text, yet still permits building important data structures for the original data set from its compressed output. This survey offers an overview of PFP, covering its core principles, the primary data structures it enables, current applications, and future research directions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData CompressionGenomicsAnimalsCompression AlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42140664
PMCPMC13262946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.