Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140626›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Soybean Crop Response Treated With Different Multifunctional Inoculants Under Field Conditions.

Cássia Cristina Rezende Mirza, Ana Paula Santos Oliveira, Maria Eduarda Silvério Mateus, Princewill Chukwuma Asobia, Cleiton Mateus Sousa, Laylla Luanna de Mello Frasca, Mariana Aguiar Silva, Enderson Petrônio de Brito Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cássia Cristina Rezende MirzaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-1907
Ana Paula Santos OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-655X
Maria Eduarda Silvério MateusUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Princewill Chukwuma AsobiaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Cleiton Mateus SousaInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-4580
Laylla Luanna de Mello FrascaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Mariana Aguiar SilvaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-5576
Enderson Petrônio de Brito FerreiraEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-1516

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 313827/2020-6Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária 20.20.00.061.00.00Fundação Araucária STI 043/2019INCT-Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms for Agricultural Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility CNPq 465133/2014-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean is the main crop in Brazilian agribusiness, but its production is limited by low soil phosphorus availability. An alternative to mitigate this constraint is the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria capable of solubilising phosphorus and producing phytohormones. This study aimed to evaluate soybean performance in response to different multifunctional inoculants under field conditions. Experiments were carried out in the 2021/22 and 2022/23 seasons in Santo Antônio de Goiás and in 2021/22 in Ceres, Brazil. The experimental design was a randomized block with 20 treatments and five replications. Treatments consisted of seed inoculation of DonMario 68i69 IPRO and NS 6906 IPRO cultivars with phosphate-solubilising bacteria (BRM 063573, BRM 67205, BRM 67207), auxin-producing bacteria (BRM 063574, BRM 36549, BRM 67206) and their pairwise combinations, plus five controls (Ab-V5, BiomaPhos, T0, T50, T100). Data were analysed using multivariate analysis in R and variance analysis (F test) at a 5% significance level, followed by Scott-Knott test. The combination BRM 67207 (Bacillus subtilis) + BRM 67206 (Bacillus pumilus) showed the best results across all experiments, enhancing pods per plant, grain yield, root biomass, total root length and root volume. This combination stands out as a promising bioinput for soybean production.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsBacillus pumilusGlycine maxBacillus subtilisBacteriaBiomassBrazilCrops, AgriculturalIndoleacetic AcidsPhosphorusPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsSeedsSoil MicrobiologyIndoleacetic AcidsPhosphorusPlant Growth RegulatorsbioinputsGlycine maxgrain yieldphytohormonesrhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID42140626
PMCPMC13179116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.