ArticleJournal of biomechanics2026
Geometric and mechanical changes along the length of the porcine aorta.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational multiscale analysis of growth and remodeling in the ascending aorta of the Marfan mouse.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aorta, the primary artery responsible for carrying blood away from the heart, exhibits variations in its geometric and mechanical properties along its total length. Although these properties have individually been investigated in various animal and human studies, comprehensive assessments measuring all these parameters simultaneously along the entire aortic length have not been well reported. Consequently, current models predicting the aorta's in vivo mechanical state are based on separately obtained parameters and thus have inherent limitations. The present study systematically quantified variations in ex vivo diameter and wall thickness, in vivo axial stretch, and ex vivo biaxial mechanical properties along the descending thoracic and abdominal segments of five Yorkshire male porcine aortas. Consistent with earlier findings, diameter decreased from ∼13 mm to ∼3.6 mm and wall thickness decreased from ∼2.05 mm to ∼1.02 mm toward distal segments, whereas in vivo axial stretch increased from ∼1.15 to ∼1.5. Notably, the infrarenal abdominal aorta exhibited significantly higher axial stiffness compared to the mid-descending thoracic region (p < 0.05). Estimated in vivo axial stress was found to increase distally (slope = 0.1, p = 0.12), while estimated in vivo circumferential stress remained relatively constant throughout the porcine aorta's length (slope = 0.004, p = 0.96). These results suggest that during development, position-specific axial stretches, possibly driven by spinal elongation, induce adaptive remodeling of aortic geometry and material properties to maintain relatively uniform circumferential stresses. The resulting dataset provides a comprehensive, location-specific characterization of aortic geometry and mechanics to support future computational modeling studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.