Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139800›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2026

Reinventing amlodipine.

Bartosz Grzymala, Dagmar Þöll Halldórsdóttir, Haraldur Þorsteinsson, Kristín Þorfinnsdóttir, Hildur Sóley Sveinsdóttir, Matthew O Parker, Sebastien Foulquier, Karl Ægir Karlsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bartosz Grzymala3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Dagmar Þöll Halldórsdóttir3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Haraldur Þorsteinsson3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kristín Þorfinnsdóttir3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Hildur Sóley Sveinsdóttir3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Matthew O ParkerSurrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Sebastien FoulquierDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Karl Ægir Karlsson3Z, Reykjavik, Iceland; Biomedical Center, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland. Electronic address: karlsson@ru.is.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder, and pharmacological treatments have limited mechanistic specificity. Most nonstimulants target noradrenergic tone but show modest efficacy. l-Type calcium channels (LTCCs) modulate neuronal excitability, catecholaminergic transmission, cortical plasticity, and neuroinflammation, processes central to ADHD pathophysiology. This review evaluates the evidence for repurposing the LTCC blocker amlodipine as a novel ADHD therapeutic. We propose a mechanistic framework where amlodipine acts within attention/arousal circuits to stabilize dopaminergic and noradrenergic tone, restore D2-autoreceptor feedback, enhance plasticity, and reduce neuroinflammation. This systems-level model provides explanatory links between drug action and ADHD pathophysiology, highlighting therapeutic avenues not addressed by current treatments. Contrary to historical assumptions, recent evidence confirms that amlodipine penetrates the blood-brain barrier. Convergent preclinical findings show phenotype rescue in zebrafish and rat models of ADHD, accompanied by normalization of ADHD-relevant metabolic pathways. Complementary biobank analyses suggest reduced traits associated with ADHD among genetically at-risk individuals taking amlodipine. Given enantiomeric pharmacology, S-amlodipine, with higher LTCC affinity and fewer off-target liabilities than R-amlodipine, emerges as a preferred candidate. Together, these findings warrant a reappraisal of LTCC modulation in ADHD. By providing mechanistic explanations of how amlodipine engages ADHD-relevant circuits, this review clarifies its therapeutic potential and reshapes our understanding of the drug itself, with implications for repurposing, enantiomer-specific development, and broader clinical translation. We outline next steps, including comparative S- versus R-amlodipine studies, mechanistic dissection of LTCC subtypes in attentional networks, and controlled clinical testing to evaluate amlodipine's viability as a nonstimulant therapeutic. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Genetic, preclinical, and translational evidence implicates dysregulated l-type calcium channel signaling in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, providing a mechanistic rationale for evaluating amlodipine as a therapeutic candidate. S-amlodipine is the rational development form, as it mediates the principal l-type calcium channel activity, whereas R-amlodipine may contribute to nonbeneficial brain or tolerability effects. This review defines a clear translational path focused on S-amlodipine, warranting prospective, dose-optimized clinical trials to determine efficacy on attentional and executive dysfunction with acceptable safety.

Indexed as

AmlodipineAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCalcium Channel BlockersAnimalsCalcium Channels, L-TypeDrug RepositioningHumansAmlodipineCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, L-TypeAmlodipineAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderDopamineDrug repurposingl-type calcium channelsS-amlodipine

Identifiers

PMID42139800
PMCPMC13494166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.