ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Subsequent risk of lung cancer in patients with positive low-dose CT screens and initial negative lung biopsy.
Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLung cancer screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality. There is a paucity of literature, however, describing the relationship between negative lung biopsy in individuals following a positive screen and ultimate lung cancer incidence. To assess this question, we analyzed data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). MATERIALS AND
methodsLDCT arm NLST participants receiving a negative biopsy after a positive screen were included in the negative biopsy cohort (NBC). Lung cancer incidence was calculated within this group overall, and by biopsy type (resection vs. non-resection). In individuals ultimately receiving a lung cancer diagnosis, the biopsy site (lobe) was compared to the cancer diagnosis site. A control cohort without lung biopsy was also compared to the NBC for lung cancer incidence.
resultsOf 10,160 LDCT arm participants with positive screens, 410 were included in the NBC, 152 with resection biopsy and 258 with non-resection biopsy. Within the NBC, lung cancer incidence rates were elevated in the non-resection versus resection biopsy group (RR = 3.5; 95% CI:1.8-6.6). The majority of biopsy sites in the non-resection group were concordant with the sites of eventual cancer diagnosis, 62.7% (p < 0.001). Individuals in the NBC had greater lung cancer incidence than controls (RR = 1.6, 95% CI:1.2-2.2) but this relationship was driven by the non-resection biopsy group (RR = 2.2, 95% CI:1.5-3.3). DISCUSSION: Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for lung cancer in individuals with positive LDCT screens and negative non-resection biopsies and counsel patients accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.