ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Navigation of Dual Identities Among Health Care Professionals Transitioning Between Clinical Practice and Research Roles: Scoping Review Protocol.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Structured Organizational Support Program to Improve Occupational Adaptation Among Newly Recruited Healthcare Professionals: A Mixed-Methods Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The transition from clinical practice to research represents a significant yet under-studied career pivot for health care professionals. Despite the growing emphasis on research integration in health care careers and increasing numbers of clinicians pursuing advanced research degrees, the transition experience remains poorly understood. This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed at examining the nuanced experiences of clinicians moving between full-time clinical practice and research roles, exploring the challenges, adjustments, and impacts on professional identity, decision-making, and career trajectories. Objective: This scoping review aims to systematically map and synthesize existing literature on health care professionals' experiences in transitioning between clinical practice and research roles. Methods: This scoping review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and validated frameworks. Comprehensive searches will be conducted across 8 databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Sage Journals, and Web of Science. Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they (1) focus on health care professionals providing direct patient care (physicians, nurses, midwives, pharmacists, dieticians, and other allied health professionals), and medical students, (2) examine transitions between clinical practice and research roles, (3) report empirical data, and (4) are published in English from 1980 onward. Two independent reviewers (SA-T and CK) will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts. A rigorous data extraction tool will be developed and piloted. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to synthesize findings. Results: This protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework in January 2024. This scoping review will be conducted as part of SAT's MD (doctor of medicine, University College Dublin, commenced July 2023) conducted at the National Maternity Hospital. As of January 2026, pilot database searches identified approximately 3000 potentially relevant studies. Preliminary analysis of a subset of randomly chosen studies was performed as a pilot test to refine the search strategy and inclusion or exclusion criteria. Full data collection will commence following protocol acceptance, with complete results expected to be submitted for publication in 2026. Conclusions: By synthesizing existing knowledge on clinical-research transitions, this review will aim to inform evidence-based support mechanisms, guide institutional policies, and enhance the training experience for the growing number of health care professionals navigating this career pathway. The findings will provide a foundation for a larger mixed methods study addressing identified knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.