Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139566›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

Changing the Child: The Impact of Novel Treatments on the Identity of Children With Monogenic Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Sietske A L van Till, Maartje H N Schermer, Hilgo Bruining, Matthijs Verhage, Eline M Bunnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sietske A L van TillDepartment of Public Health, Program for Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-9596
Maartje H N SchermerErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-9659
Hilgo BruiningN=You Neurodevelopmental Precision Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-1969
Matthijs VerhageDepartment of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-7503
Eline M BunnikDepartment of Public Health, Program for Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-6222

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 10250022110003Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 10250072310003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific advancements offer new possibilities for developing novel treatments for children with monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders (mNDDs), targeting the underlying effects of their condition. Although, in qualitative studies, parents of children with mNDDs have predominantly positive attitudes towards the development of novel treatments, a few parents express concerns about whether treatments could change who their child is. Existing literature on personal identity, including literature on how personal identity is affected by medical (neuro-)interventions, can assist in clarifying these concerns. This paper provides an analysis of interview data on perspectives of parents with children with mNDDs (STXBP1-Related Disorders and Kleefstra Syndrome) on the impact of novel treatments on their child's identity. We identify four sets of concerns, about whether treatments (1) enable children to develop their self, (2) alienate children from their true self, (3) disrupt children's relational identities, and (4) defy children's horizontal identities. While parents hope that treatments will help children flourish, some worry that treatments may alienate children from their self or alter children's personal characteristics which are meaningful to caregivers, thereby disrupting family dynamics. Others fear treatments may produce stigma by perpetuating the narrative that children need to be "fixed". This analysis helps to understand the ambivalence some parents express when considering their child's participation in clinical trials. For clinicians and researchers, it is essential to discuss parents' concerns about impacts of treatments on their child's identity (if present) when deciding on the child's participation in clinical trials, and to monitor children for identity-related effects of novel treatments.

Indexed as

Craniofacial AbnormalitiesHeart Defects, CongenitalNeurodevelopmental DisordersParentsSelf ConceptChildChromosome AberrationsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9FemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleQualitative Researchauthenticityidentityneurodevelopmental disorders/geneticspediatricstreatment development

Identifiers

PMID42139566
PMCPMC13179013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.